“No Pipeline” will result in the end of Canadian Confederation
First things first David Eby, neither you or Coastal First Nations have veto power over Canada. In fact you are giving them veto power in British Columbia in spite of the fact the Supreme Court has said they do not have that right, and in doing so you are spitting in the faces of BC Citizens. I dare you to call an election over this issue. Coastal First Nations do not represent the aboriginals of British Columbia, its an organization that represents only 16 of the 202 First Nations and somehow you act like they trump the rights of the remaining 186 First Nations
Also left cleverly hidden from the public is the Coastal First Nations (it’s an organization) received almost all of its operating costs directly from the Tides Foundation via its Canadian counterpart. How can you trust a consortium of aboriginals that are paid by the Americans to oppose oil pipelines? They are doing the bidding of the American Tides Foundation under the pretext of defending their people. The Judas Principle in full play here.
$39,818.00 – July 25th 2024
$58,995.00 – July 25, 2024
$3,594.00 – July 25th 2024
$75,015.00 – July 25th 2024
$3,847.00 – July 25th 2024
$10,893.00 – July 25th 2024
$81,819.00 – July 25th 2024
$19,187.00 – July 25th 2024
$33,754.00 – July 25th 2024
$134,001.00 – June 27th 2024
$257,349.00 – June 11th 2024
$630,651.00 – June 24th 2024
$50,000.00 – June 7th 2024
$3,770,361.00 – June 5th 2024
The Judas Principle generally refers to the idea of betrayal, often in a leadership or organizational context, where someone close to a leader or group betrays their trust. It can also relate to the moral and ethical implications of such actions.
Its so clever of David Eby to omit that 31 of the 40 First Nations communities signed on as owners of the Northern Gateway pipeline and were set to get $2 billion in benefits from the project over 30 years. Then you have the unmitigated gall to suggest that building that same pipeline has no First Nations support.
“David Eby you do not have the right to override Alberta’s constitutional right to put in a pipeline to the BC Coast. This is 100% the duty of the Federal Goverment, to insure Alberta “can” put in a pipeline to sell its products to market regardless of your opposition to this product.”
“It’s not an opinion, its the law.”
Even if you ram your delusions down the throats of British Columbia residents you do not get to re-write the facts. The majority of British Columbia residents support building the Spirit Bear Pipeline. Stop with your insinuations that the voters of British Columbia support you on this issue, they don’t.
There is a reason British Columbia entered Confederation, but confederation all ends if Eby refuses to allow confederation to work. The NDP/Liberal Coalition are running our nation with a minority government. Separation is not a threat anymore, its a cold reality that is staring every Canadian in the face, and other than a few out of touch cities in the lower mainland (NDP strong holds) more than 90% of British Columbia residences living outside of these cities would vote to leave as well.
No matter how you cut it, Alberta will not stay in a nation that wants billions in equalization payments, and at the same time wants to cripple its economy. Face it, one of the biggest lies ever told is that keeping Alberta’s oil in the ground, will somehow save the planet. At very earliest the world could get off fossil fuels would be at least 20 to 30 years from now. During that time Alberta’s could help pay for the change over to renewable energies, or, it could let other nations sell oil gas and coal, the bottom line is if there is a need for oil and gas, we can either be part of selling it, or watch as other nations provide that fuel.
The problem is that renewable energy is simply not capable of replacing fossil fuels, with no hope that it can do so in the next 20 to 30 years is why even the NDP have ditched the EV mandate it set years ago, we do not have enough power to run what we already have, let along build more data centres, the futures billion dollar industry.
The proponents of keeping Canadian oil and gas in the ground only care about keeping it in the ground and have their heads in the sand in regards to viable alternatives, at this point in history one could seriously question if they even care if an alternative will exist at all. Preferring crashing the worlds population over surviving the phony crisis.
Like a satanic prayer they keep saying windmills and solar panels, but never acknowledge that its a drop in the bucket of energy that is needed to replace fossil fuels. Even the so called climate crisis is now admittedly just a hoax to get people to stop using fossil fuels with only a promise and a dream to replace the energy actually needed. They won’t even talk about the carbon footprint needed to make them or to get rid of the dead ones.
Statements like the ones made by Marilyn Slett, Chief of the Heiltsuk Nation show how they are either intentionally lying or are too ignorant to study the facts. ““We know fully the effects of what an oil spill can do to the ocean, to our bread basket, to our way of life,” Slett said. BC’s north coast is immediately adjacent to Prince William Sound, site of 1989’s notorious Exxon Valdez spill ”
What a total load of BUNK that statement is when evidence has already shown this statement is pure fiction. Marilyn Slett please explain why there is a greater abundance of salmon and seafood in the area surrounding the Exxon Valdez disaster?
People like David Eby and his band of Tides funded Indians, are lying through their teeth when they talk about Prince William Sound, and the notorious Exxon Valdez spill.
She is not alone in using Exxon Valdez spill as thier prime evidence why a tanker ban needs to exist.
Don’t let facts get in the way here.
The notorious Exxon Valdez spill that occurred in Alaska’s Prince William Sound on March 24, 1989 was a single hull tanker that no longer exist in Canadian waters.
Its funny, actually its not, that these same people never want to talk about what happened to the marine life in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. The Exxon Valdez incident occurred in in 1989 and looking at the records of salmon catch in this area, it begs to explain why salmon in Alaska’s Prince William Sound are better than the catch numbers inside the Tanker Ban zone. Please read that again, it was not a typo. So so only mismanagement could possible explain the disaster of salmon stocks on the Skeena and Nass rivers. Even the Fraser river stocks (lots of Oil Tankers here) did better than the salmon in Nathan Cullens Tanker Ban zone, don’t let facts get in your way.
What none of these people using the Exxon Valdez as their primary evidence is that there was no lasting environmental effect on salmon in Alaska’s Prince William Sound One could even make the argument that salmon seeen to do better outside of a tanker ban zone than inside of one, there was no oil spills inside the tanker ban zone,
“The Copper River in Alaska is known for its salmon returns, particularly for king (Chinook) and sockeye salmon. For 2025, the forecast predicts a run size of 25,000 to 51,000 king salmon, while sockeye salmon are expected to return in significant numbers, estimated between 2.27 million and 3 million, reflecting a healthy fishery management approach.”
Keep in mind this is ground zero of the Exxon Valdez disaster.
Compare that to the salmon runs inside Nathan Cullen’s tanker ban zone.
