What makes UNDRIP so obnoxious?
The problem with UNDRIP is that it is the creation or product of people who are a complete failure on the issues of human rights. It sort of like allowing the inmates of Canada to dictate the rules of our Parliament. To understand why I am so dead set against UNDRIP you need to know whose idea it was and who put this resolution on the table of the United Nations.
Like any political scheme, one must first identify who the target of this scheme is. In our case the attack is brought on by a list of extremely unscrupulous nations , most of whom have horrible human rights records. To understand UNDRIP you need to look at how it came into existence,and who come up with the idea.
Somehow completely absent from this conversation is asking the aboriginal people’s opinion regarding the content of any resolution, in fact it sort of suggests aboriginals lack the ability to speak for themselves. The UN is sucking the public into believing the criminal elements are the victims. Every nations voting on this resolution had nothing to lose, and everything to gain from destroying the economic prosperity of our nation.
The UN was not created to become the New World Order, the United Nations has its origins in World War II, beginning with the Declaration of St James’s Palace. Taking up the Wilsonian mantle in 1944–1945, US president Franklin D. Roosevelt pushed as his highest postwar priority the establishment of the United Nations to replace the defunct League of Nations. Clearly they are so off track and think they now rule the world, its time for Canada to leave the United Nations. The UN has been at the forefront of telling Canadians what to do with our nation,and continuely involve themselves with matters that are purely sovereign issues, its a complete violation of our sovereign rights, and its exactly the reason the UNDRIP is non binding. Its not thier right to make that decision, we need to stand up against this tyranny of nations who want Canada to crumble while they are entitled to break all rules regarding human rights abuse.
Let’s journey back in time. In September 2007 these unscrupulous nations subjected Canada, United States, Australia and New Zealand to UNDRIP.
UNDRIP was rejected by all of its intended victims, its a historical fact. Oddly the line of division is the most successful economies on earth vs the nations that are all begging for financial support from the very nations they want to cripple. Later I will show you it had very little to do with actually helping aboriginal people. Its created by have not nations who want to bring successful democracies down to the same poverty level they created for themselves.
UNDRIP is 100% the product to trying to cripple the economies of the Western World, to give the advantage to nations who today struggle to keep up, mostly due to self imposed stupidity in regulatory choices.
“The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP or DOTROIP is a legally non-binding United Nations resolution passed by the United Nations on 13th September, 2007 that delineates and defines the individual and collective rights of indigenous peoples, including their ownership rights, cultural and ceremonial expression, identity, language, employment, health, education and other issues. Their ownership also extends to the protection of their Indigenous intellectual property. The declaration “emphasizes the rights of Indigenous peoples to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, cultures and traditions, and to pursue their development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations.”It “prohibits discrimination against indigenous peoples and promotes their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them, and their right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic and social development”.
“Keep in mind this resolution is a legally non-binding United Nations resolution.”
“even to this very day”
HISTORY – How did this all happen and by whom. Was it merely caring for aboriginal people when the nations who coined UNIDRP were all nations suffering from economic failure? Was the answer to their problem tearing down nations who were at the top of economic success?
Issues concerning indigenous peoples on a world scale began to be reevaluated in 1982 with the establishment of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations, formed by the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). its goal was to create an overarching document to protect the rights and privileges of indigenous peoples worldwide.
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
The key to understanding UNDRIP is when did it become an issue, that year is on public record as 1982. A working group was formed called the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and they formed a group called “Working Group on Indigenous Populations”
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) established the Working Group on Indigenous Populations. It consisted of the following nations. Note we highlighted some of the human rights abuses as it seems the LGBTQIA+ groups are really getting loud about UNDRIP in an attempt to get exchange support, so they better understand what and who created UNDRIP and radical aboriginals who want to dismantle Canada. If you have legitimate concerns about LGBTQIA+ rights, why would you support nations who oppose your rights?
Do you really think the following nations should be allowed to dictate the contents of UNDRIP?
Do you really believe that these nations are concerned about indigenous people in Canada, USA, Australia and New Zealand?
Consider these are the founding fathers of UNDRIP – How can any civilized human being even consider allowing these nations to create rules regarding aboriginals?
Benin – Benin 2023 Human Rights Report – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including censorship and the enforcement of and threats to enforce criminal libel laws; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly; lack of investigation of and accountability for gender-based violence, including domestic and intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and child, early, and forced marriage; and child labor.
Liberia – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government or on behalf of the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists and censorship; serious government corruption; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and female genital mutilation/cutting; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex conduct between adults, which were enforced; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; and systematic restrictions on workers’ freedom of association.
Nigeria – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary and unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious abuses in a conflict, including reportedly unlawful or widespread civilian deaths or harm, enforced disappearances or abductions, torture, and physical abuses; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists and enforcement of criminal libel laws to limit expression; serious government corruption; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, child, early and forced marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting, and other forms of such violence; enforcement of laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults; and existence of any of the worst forms of child labor.
Mali – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by government forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious abuses in a conflict, including reportedly unlawful or widespread civilian deaths or harm, enforced disappearances and abductions, torture, physical abuses, and conflict-related sexual violence or punishment; unlawful recruitment or use of children in armed conflict by the armed forces and nonstate armed groups; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests of journalists, censorship, and enforcement of criminal libel laws to limit expression; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; inability of citizens to change their government peacefully through free and fair elections; serious and unreasonable restrictions on political participation; serious government corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, child, early, and forced marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting, and other forms of such violence; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting members of national and ethnic groups; laws used to criminalize consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, although not enforced; and existence of the worst forms of child labor. With occasional notable exceptions, the transition government did not take credible steps to identify and punish officials who may have committed human rights abuses. Nonstate armed groups, including several signatories to the 2015 Algiers Accord for Peace and Reconciliation in Mali (Algiers Accord), committed serious human rights abuses, including summary executions, physical abuse, and the unlawful recruitment and use of child soldiers. Russia’s Wagner Group forces, often operating in close coordination with the Malian Armed Forces, allegedly committed unlawful killings, rapes, and other abuses. Terrorist groups kidnapped and killed civilians, including humanitarian workers. Ethnic militias, formed to defend one ethnic group from other ethnic groups or other armed groups, committed serious human rights abuses, including summary executions and destroying homes and food stores. Authorities generally did not investigate these abuses, many of which occurred in areas outside the government’s control.
Kenya – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearances; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists and censorship; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; serious government corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, female genital mutilation/cutting, and other forms of such violence; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, although there were no reports of the law being enforced; and the existence of the worst forms of child labor.
Ethiopia – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial killings by the government; enforced disappearance by the government; torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; political prisoners or detainees; serious abuses in a conflict, including unlawful or widespread civilian harm; unlawful recruitment or use of child soldiers by government forces and militia groups; serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests of journalists, censorship, and the existence of criminal libel and slander laws; serious restrictions on internet freedom; interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly; government corruption; lack of investigation of and accountability for gender-based violence including rape and conflict-related sexual violence; trafficking in persons; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting members of racial or ethnic minority groups; and existence or use of laws criminalizing same-sex sexual conduct.
Sudan – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; political prisoners or detainees; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious abuses in a conflict, including unlawful or widespread civilian deaths or harm; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence and threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests and prosecutions of journalists, and censorship; serious restrictions on internet freedom; substantial interference with freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including overly restrictive laws on the organization, funding, or operation of nongovernmental and civil society organizations; inability of citizens to change their government peacefully through free and fair elections; serious government corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic and intimate partner violence, sexual violence, child, early and forced marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting, and other forms of such sexual violence; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting members of national/racial/ethnic groups or Indigenous peoples such as the Massalit; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, which were enforced; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; and prohibiting independent trade unions or significant or systematic restrictions on workers’ freedom of association.
Libya – Significant human rights problems included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings; enforced disappearance; torture or other physical abuses perpetrated by armed groups on all sides; harsh and life-threatening conditions in prison and detention facilities; arbitrary arrest or detention; political prisoners or detainees; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious abuses in a conflict, including widespread civilian deaths or harm; serious restrictions on free expression and media, including violence against journalists and enforcement of or threat to enforce criminal libel laws to limit expression; substantial interference with freedom of association and peaceable assembly; refoulement of refugees and asylum seekers to a country where they would face torture or persecution; serious government corruption; lack of investigation of and accountability for gender-based violence; threats of violence targeting members of ethnic minority groups and foreigners; trafficking in persons, including forced labor; enforcement of or threat to enforce laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults; and significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association, including limits on collective bargaining and the right to strike.
Tunisia – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: torture by government agents; arbitrary arrests or detentions; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media, including arrests or prosecutions of journalists, censorship, or enforcement of or threat to enforce criminal libel laws to limit expression; government corruption; discrimination and societal abuses; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex persons; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults and the enforcement of those laws; and the worst forms of child labor.
Swaziland – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; transnational repression against individuals in another country; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including censorship; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; serious and unreasonable restrictions on political participation; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, workplace violence, and child, early, and forced marriage; trafficking in persons; significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association, including threats against labor activists; and the existence of the worst forms of child labor.
Malawi – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists and enforcement of criminal libel laws to limit expression; serious government corruption; extensive-gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and child and early marriage; and laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, which were enforced.
Cameroon – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious abuses in a conflict, including reportedly unlawful or widespread civilian deaths or harm, enforced disappearances or abductions, torture, and physical abuses; unlawful recruitment or use of children in armed conflict by nonstate groups; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists, and censorship; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; restrictions on freedom of movement within the territory of a state; serious government corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual violence, child, early and forced marriage, and other forms of such violence; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting members of ethnic groups and Indigenous peoples; laws criminalizing same-sex sexual conduct between adults, which were enforced; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; and systematic restrictions on workers’ freedom of association, including violence and threats against labor activists.
Burundi – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by or on behalf of the government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; punishment of family members for alleged offenses by a relative; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, censorship, and the use of criminal libel laws to limit expression; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including overly restrictive laws on the organization, funding, or operation of nongovernmental organizations and civil society organizations; restrictions on freedom of movement and residence; serious and unreasonable restrictions on political participation; serious government corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based violence, including but not limited to domestic and intimate partner violence, sexual violence, child, early and forced marriage, and other forms of such violence; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults that were enforced; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; and significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association.
Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo) – Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government; involuntary or coercive medical or psychological practices; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; punishment of family members for alleged offenses by a relative; serious abuses in conflict, including reportedly unlawful or widespread civilian deaths or harm, enforced disappearances or abductions, torture, physical abuses, and conflict-related sexual violence or punishment; unlawful recruitment or use of children in armed conflict by armed groups or the armed forces; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists, censorship, and enforcement of or threat to enforce criminal libel laws to limit expression; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including under the state of siege in the eastern part of the country; restrictions on freedom of movement and residence within the territory of a state and on the right to leave the country; serious government corruption; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic and intimate partner violence, sexual violence, workplace violence, child, early, and forced marriage, and other forms of such violence; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting members of ethnic groups or Indigenous peoples; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting persons with disabilities; and the existence of the worst forms of child labor.
Now that you know who was behind UNDRIP, are you OK with the nations that created it, and you are also aware of their agenda, as to why they chose to target western nations?
I do want to give the lasts words to a First Nations Chief, also a former MLA and now MP in the Canadian Parliament, even I could not have said it better. The following two videos belong to their perspective creators, we are including them for historical and educational purposes, we gain no income from posting them here.
On the topic of UNDRIP – by Ellis Ross
On the topic of Reconciliation – by Ellis Ross